![]() |
NR
LSO PAC 222
CAPT Patricia Yap, Commanding Officer |
|
Disclaimers / Terms and Conditions [This is an unofficial webpage for the above command, and has no affiliation whatsoever with the Department of Defense, the Department of the Navy, or any other governmental entity. The opinions stated are solely those of the author/host, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the US Government or its agents or employees. Use this site at your own risk. There are no warranties, either implied or expressed. You do not become a "client" by using this site. The fact that there are references to sites affiliated to the US Government do not cause this to be an endorsement of the host or any person affiliated to the Host. This unofficial page is provided for the convenience of the military legal community. If you do not understand and agree to the above and the terms found below, then you are to leave this site immediately. Last updated 05/28/04 ] (better know as the "Fine Print Page") Terms and Conditions: By using this Site and continuing to use this Site,
you are agreeing to the terms and conditions set forth herein, and that you have read this
entire page. If you are not willing to so agree, then you must leave this Site. Electronic or e-mail communications: As most people know, communications between attorneys and their clients are mostly confidential, to a similar degree as if this person talked with his or her minister or doctor. However, those rules of confidentiality were written long before the Internet and e-mail. These laws were written when one actually had to open a physical envelope or when people generally could meet in a completely private room. This is obviously not the case anymore in our fast-paced lives of cellular calls, faxes, e-mails and pagers. As such, this is all a developing area of the law. Further, the law has not caught up with these very popular methods of communications. As most people know, communications between attorneys and their clients are mostly confidential, to a similar degree as if this person talked with his or her minister or doctor. However, those rules of confidentiality were written long before the Internet and e-mail. These laws were written when one actually had to open a physical envelope or when people generally could meet in a completely private room. This is obviously not the case anymore in our fast-paced lives of cellular calls, faxes, e-mails and pagers. As such, this is all a developing area of the law. Further, the law has not caught up with these very popular methods of communications. If you use e-mail to communicate with a lawyer (even if you merely volunteer information over the internet), you must know and understand that such messages and communications could be intercepted by third persons who are totally unrelated to the lawyer or his/her computer company (ISP). Likewise, the sender could accidentally misaddress electronic correspondence (like sending a fax to the wrong number) and it could be read by others. While this inappropriate interception is certainly not the norm, it is a possibility that must be considered by the sender. The host of this site has no control over those persons, and it is possible that such communications which you thought were confidential could be disclosed either directly or after court process. By placing this caveat (informing the reader of this possibility), this does not in any way act as a waiver of any legal privilege. Hazards of Electronic Information: This Site may contain legal information, references, news, synopses of cases, and the like. You may also receive a reference to other sites containing this type of information. A sad reality of this information age is that information can change very quickly. A reader should treat legal information much as they would medical information; you wouldnt diagnoses yourself regarding a medical condition just based on a website and you would talk to the doctor first. The reader should make no decision of legal consequence to him or her
solely based on information which he or she finds on this Site or any referred site. Cases
change and can be overturned by higher courts or new legislation. You may have even found
governmental websites quoting law that has been superseded for years. News accounts may be
inaccurate or misleading, and be totally inapplicable to the readers situation. The
reader may think that his or her case is exactly like one seen on the Internet, but truly
it is not. Therefore, be very careful in your browsing and develop a relationship with your
engaged professional before making any consequential decisions. Professional memberships (to include but not be limited to local bar memberships) shall not be considered an endorsement by any such group or organization, nor shall they be deemed to specially qualify an attorney as an expert or specialist unless otherwise expressly noted. Likewise, licencing by any governmental agency or board shall not be considered an endorsement by any such body, nor shall it be deemed to specially qualify an attorney as an expert or specialist unless otherwise expressly noted. All fees are negotiable contracts as a matter of law, with limited exceptions. You should always discuss the fee arrangement and execute an agreement before undertaking the representation by any attorney. (Updated 11/5/2000)
|
||